EN 
SK 
DE 
FR 
HU 
PL 
As COP16 draws to a close, there is still a significant gap between ambition and funding needed to achieve the target of protecting 30 % of the world's ecosystems by 2030 ("30 x 30"). Although private funding for nature-based solutions has grown significantly in recent years, it still exists a $700 billion biodiversity funding gap.
In this context, voluntary carbon markets (VCMs) appear to be a promising mechanism to bridge this gap, especially given that markets for biodiversity credits are still in their early stages of development.
VCMs offer several key advantages:
- They provide immediate financial flows for conservation initiatives.
- They have the potential to provide up to 32 % of the global potential of nature-based solutions by 2030.
- By incorporating biodiversity considerations into carbon offset projects, VCMs can address both climate change and biodiversity loss.
- They provide a model for biodiversity credit markets to learn from and accelerate their own development.
The Rimba Raya project in Indonesia is an example of how VCMs can bring benefits to both climate and biodiversity.
Although VCMs are not flawless, their management is much more advanced than the management of biodiversity markets, allowing them to provide a basis for the development of credible biodiversity credits.
VCM also emphasized the importance of:
- Strong management and transparency.
- Robust methodologies for accurate measurement and monitoring of impacts on biodiversity.
- Involvement and strengthening of local communities.
By harnessing the dynamics of VCM, we can begin to close the gap in biodiversity financing, accelerate ecosystem protection and lay the foundations for sustainable financial mechanisms such as biodiversity credits.
While we still have a long way to go to ensure high integrity in carbon markets, their potential to generate dual benefits for climate change mitigation and biodiversity makes them a powerful tool in the fight against both crises. (CO2AI)
